🔗 Share this article

Just recently, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party economic plan. People have been asking for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. By way of the choices made – a shift to a fairer tax system, focusing on wealth to fund tackling child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally set out what we believe in.

This is why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the battles to come. And it’s why the protests from the conservative side began right away.

The Main Political Divide in UK Politics

The central division in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who want to change it so it helps everyday working people, and on the opposite side, our political opponents, who favor the status quo and the unsuccessful doctrine of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.

The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by any measure, they got far more dire. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, cutting off investment (causing us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.

Record of Decline Under the Previous Administration

Living standards fell by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis took hold, young people scarred by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The history of failure continues.

A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a long-term plan for renewal and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the case for why our approach will yield benefits.

Welfare Spending and Child Poverty

Under the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to manage the symptoms instead of the cure.

It’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap

This is also the reason we are completely justified to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For eight long years, since it was enacted, low-income families with children have suffered from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.

It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.

Tangible Effects in Communities

From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty.

Lasting Effects of Youth Hardship

Just a quarter of pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among wealthier families. This predisposes them for the disadvantages they face during their lives: unrealized potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.

Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.

That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 additional children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so acting early in the parliament was vital.

The cap was a symbol to 14 years of failed rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.

Equitable Funding for Measures

We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being paid for in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Final Thoughts

Fairness and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the battle of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political megaphone and define the narrative more strongly about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.

So let’s keep hold of it and prevail in this struggle about how we will rebuild Britain and address the entrenched inequalities impeding progress.