🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When including these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation is that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.